Regulatory Tailwinds for Lithium
The rules are written. The policy flywheel is spinning. Is a lithium boom next?
Critical Raw Materials (CRM) Mandates
Governments aren’t just talking strategy anymore - they’re writing rules that favor local, low-carbon lithium. The table below summarizes flagship CRM policies across major regions and the specific tailwinds they create for lithium, including domestic content targets, fast-track permitting, tax credits, funding windows, and “strategic project” labels that ease financing.
What it means: clearer demand signals, quicker approvals, and preferential capital for projects that deliver regional supply with strong ESG - a fit for modular, co-located brine-to-chemicals models like Lithium Harvest’s.
Scan the table to see how policy is turning into bankable momentum for lithium.
Law/Strategy |
Tailwind for Lithium |
|
|---|---|---|
| European Union | Critical Raw Materials Act (2024) | Sets 2030 target to extract ≥10% and refine ≥40% of EU lithium demand domestically. Fast-track permits and “Strategic Project” label open access to EU funding. |
| European Union | Competitiveness Compass for the EU (2024) | Dedicated financial window for domestic processing/cell manufacturing; brine-to-chemicals projects can qualify. |
| European Union | The EU Battery Regulation | The goal is to increase transparency and incentivize the production of batteries with a lower environmental impact. |
| United States | Executive Measures to Increase Domestic Mineral Production (2025) | Accelerated federal permitting timelines for CRM mining projects. Encourage domestic exploration and development of CRMs - reduced reliance on foreign sources. |
| Canada | Canadian Critical Minerals Strategy | C$3.8B for exploration, infrastructure, processing, and R&D; 30% exploration tax credit - direct support for Alberta brine project LOI. |
| Australia | Critical Minerals Strategy 2023-30 | AUD 500M via NAIF for lithium projects in the north; lithium is classed “strategic” for loans and fast-track approvals. |
| Australia | Future Made in Australia Plan - Critical Minerals | AUD 566M for geological surveys and downstream processing - opens co-investment options for novel extraction tech. |
| China | National Lithium Strategy (2023) | Grants “strategic” status to lithium, offers long-term concessions and tech-transfer clauses, but with a PPP structure - signals sustained state backing for new extraction tech. |
| China | 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-25) | Prioritizes lithium supply security through easier land allocation, rapid permitting, and infrastructure support for upstream lithium operations. |
| India | National Critical Mineral Mission (2023) | $1.9B public spend + expected $2B public-sector investment across the lithium value chain. |
Law/Strategy
Tailwind for Lithium
Offtake Markets - BESS Mandates
Storage policy is turning into purchase orders. Across key regions, grants, storage targets, and grid flexibility funds are accelerating utility and residential battery deployments—most of which are lithium-ion. The table illustrates how public programs de-risk CapEx, accelerate scale, and translate directly into near-term bankable lithium demand.
Policy/Program |
Lithium Demand Tailwind |
|
|---|---|---|
| Austria, Czech Rep., Lithuania, Malta, Poland, and Romania | National CapEx-grant schemes for home batteries | Upfront grants, triggering the rapid uptake of lithium-ion systems and increasing residential demand across CEE. |
| Canada | Smart Renewables & Electrification Pathways (SREPs) | Federal program covers up to 50% of project CapEx for utility-scale BESS paired with renewables |
| Australia | National Electricity Market (NEM) reforms & state roadmaps | State targets - for example, NSW Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap: 2 GW/8 GWh by 2030 |
| China | 14th Five-Year Plan for New-Energy Storage (2021-25) | Mandates ≥30 GW new storage by 2025; 90% expected to be lithium-ion. |
| European Union | The European Green Deal | €86B earmarked for grid flexibility - including BESS - to integrate 740 GW of renewables by 2030 |
Policy/Program
Lithium Demand Tailwind
Offtake Markets - EV Mandates
EV policy is converting into battery orders. Across major markets, CO₂ standards, ZEV sales quotas, charging network rules, purchase incentives, and manufacturing funds are driving multi-year EV growth - and with it, lithium demand. The table below highlights where these programs de-risk demand for cells and cathodes, pull forward capacity, and favor local, low-carbon supply. For Lithium Harvest, that means clearer offtake signals and a premium on modular, co-located brine-to-chemicals production.
Policy/Program |
Tailwind for EV Uptake (and Lithium) |
|
|---|---|---|
| European Union | Industrial Action Plan for the EU Automotive Sector | €3B earmarked for battery manufacturing capacity across member states. |
| European Union | Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR) | Sets minimum power, distance and coverage standards for public EV chargers across the EU. |
| European Union | Regulations (EC) 443/2009 & (EU) 510/2011 | Progressive CO₂ standards for new cars and vans; zero-emission trajectory by 2035. |
| European Union | European Green Deal | A sector-wide decarbonization roadmap is placing EVs and zero-emission mobility at the core. |
| China | National Development & Reform Commission EV subsidies | Grants for NEVs; extra bonuses for scrapping ICE cars registered before 2012/2014 (gasoline/diesel) and early NEVs (pre-2018). |
| Colombia | Resolution 20243040064105 (2024) - Technological Advancement Fund | COP 12B fund covers the price gap between petrol cars and zero-emission vehicles. |
| Japan | Clean-Energy Vehicle (CEV) Subsidy | Direct purchase subsidies for passenger EVs. |
| Brazil | Rota 2030 Program | Incentivizes the R&D and production of cleaner vehicles, offering tax credits. |
| Singapore | Electric Vehicle Early Adoption Incentive (EEAI) | Registration tax rebates for new EV buyers. |
| United Kingdom | Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Mandate | Requires 80% ZEV car sales and 70% ZEV van sales by 2030, rising to 100% by 2035. |
| United Kingdom | Advanced Manufacturing Plan | £2.4B capital and R&D funding through 2030 to anchor EV supply-chain investments. |
| Malta | Grant Scheme for the Purchase of New EVs | Grants for private and commercial BEVs, plus a bonus for scrapping old vehicles. |
| Slovak Republic | Automotive Electric Vehicles Action Plan | Financial incentives for EV purchases and charging infrastructure, as well as supportive tax measures. |
| Spain | Spanish State-Aid Scheme (TCTF) | Capital support for battery and clean-tech manufacturing projects. |
| Canada | Electric Vehicle Availability Standard | Mandatory ZEV sales quotas: 20% by 2026, 60% by 2030, 100% by 2035. |
| Ireland | Climate Action Plan | Targets 30% of vehicle stock and 100% of new LDV sales to be EVs by 2030. |
Policy/Program
Tailwind for EV Uptake (and Lithium)
Countries ICE-Ban Commitments (Passenger Cars)
Fixed deadlines create policy certainty. As phase-out dates for the 2030-2050 period lock in, model planning and charging infrastructure buildouts accelerate, along with long-dated battery procurement.
Phase-out year 2030 |
Phase-out year 2035 |
Phase-out year 2040 |
Phase-out year 2050 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Countries/jurisdictions mandating 100% zero-emission new-car sales | Norway (2025), Denmark, Ireland, Iceland, Sweden, Israel, Netherlands, Singapore, Slovenia | United Kingdom, Cabo Verde, China, Japan, Canada, California (U.S.), Rest of the EU, South Korea, Thailand | France, Spain, Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Vietnam | Costa Rica |
Phase-out year 2030
Phase-out year 2035
Phase-out year 2040
Phase-out year 2050
Automaker Phase-Out & Electrification Targets
OEM commitments evolve into platforms, capital expenditures, and multi-year cell contracts. That pulls lithium offtake forward and rewards regional, low-carbon supply that can scale fast.
Before 2030 |
Before 2035 |
2040-2025 Long View |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Bentley | - | Stop ICE sales shortly after 2035 | - |
| Volkswagen | ≥80% EV sales in EU; 55% in NA | Stop ICE sales in EU | Group-wide carbon-neutrality by 2050 |
| Toyota | 55 electrified models on sale (2025 target) | 50% ZEV sales worldwide | - |
| Volvo Cars | 50% EV/PHEV mix (2025 target) | 100% EV & PHEV only | - |
| Jaguar | 100% BEV brand by 2025 | - | - |
| Mercedes-Benz | 50% electrified sales | - | - |
| Subaru | 50% electrified sales | - | - |
| Hyundai-Kia | - | 100% electrified sales in Europe | Close to 100% electrified globally by 2040 |
| Nissan | 100% BEV sales in Europe | - | Carbon-neutrality across PLC by 2050 |
| General Motors | - | - | End ICE sales globally by 2040 |
| Renault Group | 100% EV sales in Europe | - | Carbon-neutral group by 2050 |
| Mazda | 25-40% EV share | - | Carbon-neutral by 2050 |
| BMW Group | EVs ≈50% of deliveries | - | End ICE sales “well before 2050” |
| Honda | EV+FCEV = 40% global sales | - | 100% EV+FCEV sales globally by 2040 |
| Ford Motor | ≥50% global sales EV or PHEV | - | - |
| Mitsubishi | - | 100% electrified sales | - |
| Suzuki | 80% BEV sales in Europe | - | - |
Before 2030
Before 2035
2040-2025 Long View
Unified Regulatory Tailwinds
The demand and supply flywheel powering Lithium Harvest.
Policy makers are eliminating both classic commodity questions - “Will demand materialize?” and “Can supply be built fast enough?” - in our favor. Lithium Harvest’s low-cost, low-carbon extraction platform is designed to capitalize on these government-guaranteed conditions, providing partners with exposure to a policy-protected, ESG-preferred growth engine rather than a speculative commodity cycle. That flywheel delivers a tailwind measured in decades, not quarters.
Governments, regulators, and automakers are now pulling in the same direction, hard-wiring a lithium-hungry future across three mutually reinforcing fronts:
-
Supply Is Being Nationally Secured
Policy Signal
Over 37 countries (including the EU, US, and Canada) now list lithium as a “strategic” or “critical” mineral in statutes or strategy papers. Those frameworks direct >US$10B in grants, tax credits, and low-cost loans to domestic extraction and refining.
What It Means
Fast-track permits, refundable tax credits, and concessionary debt compress payback periods and raise IRRs for low-carbon projects that locate in (or ally with) each jurisdiction.
Why Lithium Harvest Is Advantageous
Our modular, brine-based DLE plants qualify for “Strategic Project” or equivalent status, unlocking accelerated approvals and non-dilutive funding.
-
Demand Is Being Legislated, Not Just Subsidized
Policy Signal
EV sales quotas/ICE bans: 19 sovereign markets have legal 100% ZEV deadlines - nine of them by 2030. BESS mandates: EU allocates €86B for grid flexibility; US offers a 30% standalone-storage ITC through 2032.
What It Means
EV and storage adoption becomes a compliance obligation, not a discretionary purchase, locking in price-inelastic lithium demand for decades.
Why Lithium Harvest Is Advantageous
Locked-in demand creates a long-term offtake appetite for ESG-compliant lithium, exactly what Lithium Harvest supplies.
-
Low-Carbon, Domestic Production Is the Preferred Model
Policy Signal
Every major CRM law couples financial support with ESG and localization criteria (CO₂ footprint, water use, supply-chain transparency).
What It Means
Producers’ sustainable operations, along with site capacity close to end-use markets, command premium pricing and priority contracts.
Why Lithium Harvest Is Advantageous
Our process recycles over 90% of water, emits a fraction of hard-rock CO₂, and can be co-located at US, Canadian, or EU brine sites, meeting both localization and sustainability requirements.
Disclaimer
This article is for information only and is not legal, regulatory, or investment advice. The policies cited are illustrative, not exhaustive, and are subject to change over time. Always verify details with official texts, government portals, or OEM releases. Requirements vary by jurisdiction and project, so outcomes depend on site-specific factors. Any projections or references to “tailwinds” are forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties. Mentioning a policy or program does not imply endorsement, approval, or guaranteed eligibility.
Lithium
You may also be interested in: